Noul: yes or no
Use Noul for a binary decision with a clear question and a typed YES / NO result.
Example
Is this request urgent?
Try the Jev AI Playground online, then learn how typed decisions, probabilities, and confidence can turn text into a structured next action.
01 / JEV AI PLAYGROUND
Define a state, a typed question, and the answer shape. Then inspect the decision and its probability distribution.
Ready when you are
Run the decision to see a typed answer and its probability distribution.
01 / WHAT IS JEV AI?
Jev is designed for typed decisions. Give it a state and a question. Get a structured result.
Instead of asking a model to write a paragraph and then parsing the response, you define the decision you need — such as a yes/no answer, a choice between options, or a numeric score. Jev returns a result that can be used by your application, workflow, or AI agent.
Not a chatbot
Answer specific questions about a given state instead of keeping an open-ended conversation.
Typed output
Define the answer shape before running the decision so downstream code stays predictable.
Probabilities + confidence
Use uncertainty to automate, pause, or ask a human to review the next step.
02 / QUESTION TYPES
Choose the smallest answer type that matches the decision your workflow needs.
Use Noul for a binary decision with a clear question and a typed YES / NO result.
Example
Is this request urgent?
Use Choice when the system must select one route, label, or next action from a known set.
Example
Which team should handle this ticket?
Use Score when a numeric value makes ranking, prioritization, or thresholds easier to express.
Example
How likely is this lead to convert?
03 / USE CASES
A curated set of patterns drawn from community projects, GitHub repositories, and developer discussions. Metrics are community-reported examples, not Jev performance guarantees.
Route every request to the right queue, then decide which cases need priority or human attention.
Route messages to Billing, Technical, Sales, or Account while also evaluating urgency and customer sentiment.
Community example: 500 emails processed in seconds at about $0.035.
Classify inbound email, scam risk, brand partnerships, priority, and whether a human reply is needed; automate high-confidence paths and escalate the rest.
Make the next agent action explicit: use a tool, gather more context, retry, or stop.
Choose which tool to call, whether to keep collecting information, when to retry, or when the loop should stop.
Select the next click, input, or scroll from the current page state, calling a small LLM only when text understanding or input is required.
Community example: a Google Flights Zurich → London search in about 7.1 seconds / $0.0039.
Check for prompt injection, irreversible actions, and permission boundaries before a tool call; return ALLOW, APPROVE, or BLOCK.
Turn fast-moving content signals into reviewable moderation, analysis, and feed decisions.
Decide whether user-generated content is safe, promotional, or AI slop before it reaches the next system step.
Community example: real-time review of 100 comments for about $0.002.
Score hook strength, structure, evidence, CTA, and awareness stage in one structured analysis.
Community example: 724 competitor ads analyzed in about 40 seconds.
Label useful content, promotion, AI slop, and urgency as a feed scrolls, then decide what to show, collapse, or escalate.
Use numeric signals to rank work, set thresholds, and decide when a human should review the next step.
Estimate conversion likelihood from the available lead context and signals.
Map a customer message onto a Calm → Angry frustration range for prioritization and care workflows.
Score operations, pull requests, or deployment requests and decide whether human approval is required.
Evaluate a pull request against a risk matrix and route it to auto-merge or human review.
04 / HOW IT WORKS
Give Jev the text, context, or system state that needs a decision.
Ask one concrete question instead of requesting an open-ended explanation.
Use Noul, Choice, or Score to make the expected output explicit.
Combine the answer, probability, and confidence with your workflow rules.
05 / JEV AI VS LLM
Jev is not a replacement claim. It is a different interface for decisions that benefit from typed output.
| Dimension | Jev AI | Traditional LLM workflow |
|---|---|---|
| Output | Typed answer, probability, and confidence | Open-ended text that often needs parsing |
| Best for | Focused decisions and routing | Conversation, synthesis, and generation |
| Workflow fit | Directly map result fields to the next action | Add prompts, parsers, validators, and fallbacks |
| Uncertainty | Make confidence visible for review rules | Infer reliability from prose or extra tooling |
06 / CONFIDENCE + HUMAN REVIEW
A high-confidence answer may move forward automatically. A low-confidence answer can pause the flow and request more context or human review.
Confidence is a signal for workflow design, not a guarantee of correctness. Evaluate high-impact decisions with your own safeguards.
07 / API QUICKSTART
Start with raw HTTP, keep credentials on the server, and verify the current endpoint, SDK, limits, and access status with the official provider before production use.
Open the developer guidecurl -X POST "YOUR_JEV_API_ENDPOINT" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $JEV_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"state": "Several customers cannot complete payouts.",
"question": "Is this request urgent?",
"type": "noul"
}'Example shape only. This independent site does not proxy provider credentials or claim a live API response.
08 / EXAMPLES GALLERY
Ask which queue should own a ticket and return a structured route for the next system step.
Read the use caseUse a typed choice to separate safe, blocked, and human-review paths.
Read the use caseDecide whether the agent should call a tool, continue gathering context, or stop.
Read the use case04 / FAQ
Jev AI is TypeSafe AI’s first System One model. Instead of generating free-form text like ChatGPT, it takes unstructured state (text or JSON) plus typed questions and returns structured decisions — choices, scores, or yes/no probabilities — with calibrated confidence. It is designed for software to act on directly.
Traditional LLMs generate text token-by-token for humans to read. Jev AI never writes prose, code, or explanations. It performs parallel structured decisions in one pass, delivering type-safe outputs with no hallucinations of format, much lower latency (typically 70–500 ms), and far lower cost for classification, routing, and scoring tasks.
No. While it is transformer-based and understands language, Jev AI is not a generative language model. It does not produce text at all — only pre-defined typed answers with probabilities. TypeSafe calls this category a “System One Model.”
These are the three core question types: - Choice: Selects one option from a list you define (up to 255 options) and returns the full probability distribution. - Noul: Answers a yes/no question with the probability that the answer is yes. - Score: Rates the input on an ordered scale/rubric you set and returns probabilities plus a weighted score. You can mix multiple questions of any type in a single call.
TypeSafe reports end-to-end latency of 70–500 milliseconds — claimed to be 40–200× faster than frontier LLMs on equivalent structured decision tasks. Real-world tests often show median times around 250–400 ms for typical requests.
Official pricing is $0.042 per million input tokens. Output tokens are free because the response is just a few numbers. A typical short request often costs around $0.00002. Many independent playgrounds (including competitors) offer limited free trials.
Jev AI cannot invent labels or return malformed output because every possible answer is defined in advance by you. However, it can still select the wrong option. That is why the calibrated confidence scores matter — use them to route low-confidence cases to a human or fallback system.
Common high-value uses include: - Support ticket routing and triage - Agent tool selection and loop control - Risk scoring, spam/safety filters, and guardrails - Lead quality scoring - Verifying or judging outputs from other models - Real-time decisions in games, simulations, or automation It excels at high-volume, bounded judgments inside software.
Jev AI was built by TypeSafe AI, a San Francisco startup founded by Diogo Almeida (former OpenAI researcher who co-invented RLHF and worked on InstructGPT). The company raised a $40M seed round led by DCVC and emerged from stealth in September 2026.
Yes — independent sites such as jev-ai.net offer a free playground with no credit card required (subject to rate limits). You can experiment with Choice, Noul, and Score examples immediately. For production API access, use TypeSafe’s official channel or third-party gateways (OpenRouter, Vercel AI Gateway, Cloudflare).
No. Jev AI is deliberately non-generative. It only returns the typed decision and probabilities you requested. Pair it with a traditional LLM when you need explanations, writing, or complex multi-step reasoning.
No, the model weights are not open source (though some community reproductions exist). TypeSafe states that customer requests and responses are not used for training or fine-tuning. You customize behavior through the state, question wording, and criteria you provide.
Start with the visible path
Use the local playground to understand the interaction model before any future live integration is considered.